![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
If it's really discredited, of course, I shouldn't have to do this, right? But I still hear people arguing that nothing has changed, bashing the Obama tax plan with the tired old claim that only by cutting taxes for the rich and megacorporations can we promote innovation and job creation. Arguments against this, in brief:
* Note: this statement is a personal opinion, not that of my employer, nor is it intended specifically as a criticism of Microsoft.
- It's the small corporations that do the most innovating, because they're young, have less inertia and less to lose.
- As for government-supported innovation, how about all the technologies derived from military research, NASA, the NIH, etc?
- A huge chunk of taxpayer money already goes to pay private employees of government contractors (I was one at my last job).
- While I do need more support for this, I learned in college that government policy is the main thing preventing the middle class from eroding away due to the basic tendencies of a capitalist system. Further, the middle class has to be reinvented as times change, from agrarianism to industry to services to high-tech and now the emerging green-collar economy.
- Want more money to reinvest in your megacorporation? How's this: instead of cutting your taxes, we put a progressive tax on the ridiculously huge bonuses you corporate big-shots give yourselves all the time*, so you'll have an incentive to get into a lower bracket and spend the savings on building your business.
* Note: this statement is a personal opinion, not that of my employer, nor is it intended specifically as a criticism of Microsoft.